Scenario C

Eight tables selected this scenario. The chart shows three indicators, the original scenario, and changes made by the tables to the original scenario.
   
Dwelling Units
Employees
Population
Original Scenario  
988,281
1,305,811
2,273,046
Table 2 Change  
-7,581
166,357
-17,436
Table 8 Change  
23,663
39,140
54,425
Table 9 Change  
24,128
  
45,092
  
55,494
Table 11 Change  
204,564
  
233,925
  
470,497
Table 13 Change  
26,305
  
43,303
  
60,502
Table 16 Change  
-14,379
  
45,162
  
-33,072
Table 23 Change  
10,295
  
95,784
  
23,679
Table 26 Change  
3,653
  
70,040
  
8,402


Table: 2
Facilitator's Name: Sparky Harris
Spokesperson's Name: Phil Serna
  • Redirect development potential from county

  • Extend LRT instead of bus from downtown Sacramento to airport; mixed-use residential along the way in South and North Natomas; redevelop ARCO site to employment mixed-use, develope new arena downtown at SP yard.

  • More intense mixed-use residenial in older neighborhoods and RDAs to address economicall distressed areas; introduce employment- and retail-intense mixed use in select areas: Fulton Ave., Florin Rd., Franklin Blvd. Redevelop along Fulton with high quality urban infill. Get rid of tacky used car lots and makeinvestments in the aestetics of the area with the hope that high quality residential development will follow.


Table: 8
Facilitator's Name: Celia Yniguez
Spokesperson's Name: Anne Jacobs
  • Inner and outer ring of LRT loop with high density mixed use development, e.g. Watt to Swanston, from Rancho up Sunrise to Auburn to Watt; Natomas to Airport, RC to Elk Grove.

  • Along the new LRT loop, focus development around the following areas: Florin Rd, Arden Arcade, Rancho Cordova, Folsom, Elk Grove, North Natomas

  • Focus Downtown Sacramento as the cultural and entertainment center for the area.


Table: 9
Facilitator's Name: Jose Luis Caceres
Spokesperson's Name: Bill Borden
  • Light Rail to the airport like in scenario B. With med and high mixed use at LRT stations.

  • Jobs housing balance in Elk Grove, like in Scenario B. More parks.

  • More attached housing and fewer large lot homes, like in Scenario D.


Table: 11
Facilitator's Name: Greg Chew
Spokesperson's Name: Mel Billingsley
  • Develop strong transit corridors with intense mixed used around the stations

  • Preserve and add open space and parks throughout region, and preserve open space on urban edges; include network of bike and ped trailways

  • Redevelop under-used commercial areas with higher density mix of commercial retail/office and residential


Table: 13
Facilitator's Name: Todd Leon
Spokesperson's Name: Jill Lane-Johnston
  • Increase re-urbanization to save and strengthen existing neighborhoods and save ag. land

  • Preserve the current housing mix in the county but create options in the choice of housing types - example = alternative ownership housing

  • County and region need to make provisions for low income housing.


Table: 16
Facilitator's Name: Jeff Gamel
Spokesperson's Name: John Burton
  • More Parkways/Greenbelts throughtout developed areas to help provide better pedestrian circulation.

  • More transportation hubs along major corridors surrounded by mixed-use activity centers.

  • More opportunities in new growth areas (e.g., retail convenient to job centers and housing to help reduce vehicle trips). Also known as "Smart Growth".


Table: 23
Facilitator's Name: Chris Longley
Spokesperson's Name: Gwen Owens
  • More crossings of American River

  • Higher density developments along transportation cooridores. Lower density development farther from transporation centers

  • More growth through infill and re-urbanization




footer