Scenario B

Two tables selected this scenario. The chart shows three indicators, the original scenario, and changes made by the tables to the original scenario.
   
Dwelling Units
Employees
Population
Original Scenario  
983,558
1,326,879
2,262,183
Table 12 Change  
19,382
57,084
44,579
Table 20 Change  
17,933
4,175
41,246


Table: 12
Facilitator's Name: Paul Junker
Spokesperson's Name: Tricia Stevens
  • Establishing permanent buffers at urban/open space border is key.

  • Willing to accept greenfield development in some sensitive areas in order to avoid pushing urban development into outlying areas. Want Sac. County to remain the population core.

  • Emphasis on redevelopment and higher densities, but need to provide parks and amenities. Additional mixed use development nodes on Folsom Blvd. Auburn Blvd. Fulton Ave., Stockton Blvd., Franklin Blvd., Oak Park, etc. Like downtown housing and higher densities/intensification in downtown.


Table: 20
Facilitator's Name: Steve Hossack
Spokesperson's Name: Dennis Rogers
  • Increase in density along transit & transp. corridors and in neighborhoods with opportunity for reurbanization. High-density mixed-use within 1/4 mile of all transit stations, and high-density residential within 1/2 mile.

  • Connectivity of open space - regional trail routes (e.g connect Amer. River pkwy to Deer Crk. Hills). Protect open space investments with greenbelts (e.g. between Galt and South County and greenbelt in East Area)

  • Support road widenings with parkway approach (bike lanes, sidewalks with all widenings). Mitigate any widenings greater than 4 lanes with ped. bridges and safe spaces, to preserve neighborhood connections. Include bridge between Watt & Sunrise.




footer