Blueprint
Site Map | FAQ | Contact Us
About the Blueprint How the Blueprint Was Created Implementing the Blueprint Technology
Overview | Base Case | Organizers | Workshops
Blueprint Home > How Created > Workshops > Sacramento County - East

Workshop Wrap-Up

Workshop Wrap-Ups
  • Region Wide
  • County Level
  • Neighborhood Level
    • Auburn
      June 16, 2003
    • Citrus Heights
      March 18, 2003
    • Colfax
      May 8, 2003
    • Davis
      May 12, 2003
    • Del Paso Heights
      September 4, 2003
    • Elk Grove
      June 24, 2003
    • Folsom
      April 23, 2003
    • Galt
      May 28, 2003
    • Lincoln
      June 3, 2003
    • Live Oak
      September 23, 2003
    • Loomis
      May 27, 2003
    • Marysville
      June 11, 2003
    • North Highlands
      September 3, 2003
    • Oak Park
      September 8, 2003
    • Placerville
      July 7, 2003
    • Rancho Cordova
      July 16, 2003
    • Rocklin
      May 29, 2003
    • Roseville
      June 2, 2003
    • Sacramento — Midtown/Downtown
      September 10, 2003
    • Sacramento — North
      April 5, 2003
    • Sacramento — South
      April 30, 2003
    • West Sacramento
      April 10, 2003
    • Wheatland
      July 8, 2003
    • Winters
      September 15, 2003
    • Woodland
      June 18, 2003
  • Counties at Neighborhood Level
    • Placer County
      May 13, 2003
    • Sacramento County
      May 19, 2003
    • Sacramento County — Fair Oaks
      April 2, 2003
    • Sutter County/Yuba County Joint
      April 28, 2003
    • Yuba County
      May 22, 2003

Sacramento County - East

November 15th, 2003, 8:30am - Noon
Vision Service Plan
3333 Quality Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA

For more information about the different scenarios, please view the Panel Maps and the Scenario Maps.

Scenario A (0 Tables)
  • Future development same as today's.
  • Fairly low residential densities.
  • County's share of regional growth declines
Scenario B (Two Tables)
  • Strong mixture of land uses in 10 sub-areas.
  • Higher population growth than A.
  • Somewhat higher densities than A.
Scenario C (Nine Tables)
  • Smaller, mixed use activity centers/corridors.
  • Same (higher) population growth as B.
  • Higher residential densities than B.
Scenario D (5 Tables)
  • Significant re-urbanization in transit corridors.
  • Same (higher) population growth as B.
  • Focus more of growth into redevelopment areas.
  • Highest residential densities (significant increase from A).
Sacramento County - East