Presentation
Forums and Summit
Workshop Wrap-Ups
- Region Wide
- TALL Order: Choices for Our FutureApril 30, 2004
- TALL Order: Choices for Our Future
- County Level
- Placer CountyJanuary 31, 2004
- Sacramento County — CentralJanuary 10, 2004
- Sacramento County — EastNovember 15, 2003
- Sacramento County — SouthNovember 22, 2003
- Sutter CountyJanuary 24, 2004
- Yolo CountyOctober 27, 2003
- Yuba CountyFebruary 7, 2004
- Placer County
- Neighborhood Level
- AuburnJune 16, 2003
- Citrus HeightsMarch 18, 2003
- ColfaxMay 8, 2003
- DavisMay 12, 2003
- Del Paso HeightsSeptember 4, 2003
- Elk GroveJune 24, 2003
- FolsomApril 23, 2003
- GaltMay 28, 2003
- LincolnJune 3, 2003
- Live OakSeptember 23, 2003
- LoomisMay 27, 2003
- MarysvilleJune 11, 2003
- North HighlandsSeptember 3, 2003
- Oak ParkSeptember 8, 2003
- PlacervilleJuly 7, 2003
- Rancho CordovaJuly 16, 2003
- RocklinMay 29, 2003
- RosevilleJune 2, 2003
- Sacramento — Midtown/DowntownSeptember 10, 2003
- Sacramento — NorthApril 5, 2003
- Sacramento — SouthApril 30, 2003
- West SacramentoApril 10, 2003
- WheatlandJuly 8, 2003
- WintersSeptember 15, 2003
- WoodlandJune 18, 2003
- Auburn
- Counties at Neighborhood Level
- Placer CountyMay 13, 2003
- Sacramento CountyMay 19, 2003
- Sacramento County — Fair OaksApril 2, 2003
- Sutter County/Yuba County JointApril 28, 2003
- Yuba CountyMay 22, 2003
- Placer County
Sacramento County - Central/North
January 10th, 2004, 8:30am - Noon
CSUS Alumni Center
6000 J Street
Sacramento, CA
For more information about the different scenarios, please view the Panel Maps and the Scenario Maps.
Scenario A (0 Tables)
- Future development same as today's.
- Fairly low residential densities.
- County's share of regional growth declines
Scenario B (2 Tables)
- Strong mixture of land uses in 10 sub-areas.
- Higher population growth than A.
- Somewhat higher densities than A.
Scenario C (8 Tables)
- Smaller, mixed use activity centers/corridors.
- Same (higher) population growth as B.
- Higher residential densities than B.
Scenario D (19 Tables)
- Significant re-urbanization in transit corridors.
- Same (higher) population growth as B.
- Focus more of growth into redevelopment areas.
- Highest residential densities (significant increase from A).
